Did Jesus say in Mark 7 That we can eat Pork?

Food doesn’t go into your heart, but only passes through the stomach and then goes into the sewer.” (By saying this, he declared that every kind of food is acceptable in God’s eyes.) Mark 7:19 NLT

First let me say that I am explaining this with the NLT instead of the KJV, because most of our friends will be asking about this passage after reading it from the NLT and we can properly explain it using the NLT, so let’s do so. 

In Mark 7 the religious leaders are asking Jesus why He does not have His disciples follow the man -made tradition of washing of hands before eating. Jesus replies by defending the Old Testament Scriptures over man-made traditions. 

Jesus replied, “You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you, for he wrote, ‘These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me.Their worship is a farce, for they teach man-made ideas as commands from God.’ Mark 7:6-7 NLT 

Jesus is using the Old Testament as the standard against man made traditions. So it is very clear that Jesus is not doing away with any Old Testament teachings about eating pork or not. He would not defend the Old Testament and condemn man made traditions and then turn around and do away with the commands in Leviticus 11 all the same breath. That would not make sense. The context in both Jesus and the Pharisees’ minds is ceremonial washing and not pork. Jesus explains that it is not what goes in and out of our bodies that makes us clean or not but what comes out of the heart. Jesus finishes by saying, 

Food doesn’t go into your heart, but only passes through the stomach and then goes into the sewer.” (By saying this, he declared that every kind of food is acceptable in God’s eyes.) Mark 7:19 NLT

Now in the KJV Mark 7:9 ends with “purging all meats” While the NLT says “every kind of food.” The NLT is actually more accurate here. The word  that the KJV used for meat is the Greek word, “bromata.” Bromata simply means food. It does not necessarily mean flesh. So the NLT is right, Jesus said the food that comes out of your body is clean regardless if you did the traditional washing of hands or not. Again clean or unclean flesh is clearly not the issue here. Again Jesus would not exalt the Old Testament over the traditions of man and then turn around and do away with what the Old Testament taught. He is doing away with the traditions of man. Again, “bromata” simply means food not flesh of any kind though it could include flesh I suppose. So Jesus is declared all foods clean regardless of the traditional washing. When the NLT says every food is acceptable in God’s eyes it is absolutely accurate. Pork was never considered food in this context either by Jesus or the pharisees. We have to keep things in context. When you tell your kids there is no school today so you can do whatever you want, it goes without saying that they still can’t rob a bank. When you said “anything” the context was automatically understood. Likewise when it says “thus purging all meats” in the KJV or “declared that every kind of food is acceptable in God’s eyes,” the context is automatically understood that the food is clean regardless if one did the ceremonial washing or not. The Ceremonial washing does not make the food clean or unclean. The context in this story has absolutely nothing to do with pork or other unclean flesh being made clean. Matthew makes the context even more abundantly clear. 

For from the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, all sexual immorality, theft, lying, and slander.These are what defile you. Eating with unwashed hands will never defile you.” Matthew 15:20 NLT

Matthew 15:19-20 makes the context in Mark 7:19 abundantly clear that Jesus is talking about washing with unclean hands and not about pork. Again pork was not the issue to any of the parties participating in the discussion taking place in Mark 7 and Matthew 15

If Jesus had declared pork clean in Mark 7 then I would really be confused why later, in Acts 10 Peter was still following the regulations in Leviticus 11. And even then Peter makes the context of the vision of Acts 10 abundantly clear in Acts 10:28 NLT “But God has shown me that I should no longer think of anyone as impure or unclean.”  Peter tells us the context of the vision was clearly about Jews and gentiles and not clean and unclean flesh foods. While stressing the importance of context, I should also point out that in 1 Corinthians 8 when Paul is saying you can eat whatever you want, 1 Corinthians 8:1 makes food sacrificed to idols as the abundantly clear context. Again eating pork never crossed Paul’s mind while he was speaking or writing. 

Regardless if we are Jew or gentile, before the cross or after the cross we all have the same stomachs, and we don’t need just the Bible to tell us how unhealthy pork is. Just ask your doctor. My doctor, who is not even an Adventist had a video playing in the waiting room, telling us that pork triples your chances of heart disease. Let’s close by looking at this the same way we should look at every Bible teaching, in the light of the cross. In Romans 12:1-2 we are told to offer our bodies as a living sacrifice. Just as Jesus gave His body for us on the cross, we give our bodies to Christ as a living sacrifice. Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians 10:31 that whatever we eat or drink we should do for the glory of God. That includes way more than just eating pork or not. This is a challenge for all of us, including myself especially. Let’s live and eat and drink in the light of the cross, and eat and drink to have healthy bodies to help us spread the Gospel of Jesus. 

You may sutdy this week’s Sabbath School Lesson here.

You may study more about healthy living in light of the cross here.

Amplify the Gospel, Silence the Controversies

Amplified controversies can silence the Gospel, or amplifying the Gospel can silence controversies. 

The church in Jesus’ day was praying. They prayed so much Jesus had to warn people not to be showing off how much they were praying and to pray in their closets. The church in Jesus’ day was debating Scripture. Many lawyers and Pharisees would approach Jesus with some Scripture they wanted to argue over or debate. They all quoted Scripture to each other. Yet, even though they knew the Scriptures and prayed a lot, they still crucified Jesus.

Why didn’t praying and quoting Scripture keep them from turning around and crucifying the Son of God? Well, here is one thing they weren’t doing. They weren’t reaching out to serve others. They weren’t sharing the Gospel with the Samaritans and the rest of the world. They would rather be stirring up controversy in the church instead of sharing the Gospel with the world. That kind of a mindset led them to crucify Jesus. After all they had to get rid of Jesus so the Romans would not take away their church where they could have power struggles and controversies. We read of the exact opposite happening during the Protestant reformation.

In Wesley’s time, as in all ages of the church’s history, men of different gifts performed their appointed work. They did not harmonize upon every point of doctrine, but all were moved by the Spirit of God, and united in the absorbing aim to win souls to Christ. The differences between Whitefield and the Wesleys threatened at one time to create alienation; but as they learned meekness in the school of Christ, mutual forbearance and charity reconciled them. They had no time to dispute, while error and iniquity were teeming everywhere, and sinners were going down to ruin. –Ellen White, Great Controversy, Pages 257-258

While the reformers did not agree on every point, they amplified the Gospel and silenced controversies. Please notice that even though they did not all agree on every point they were still all led by the Holy Spirit. They avoided needless controversy so they could reach the lost, instead of avoiding the lost to engage in needless controversy.

Of course I realize not all controversy is needless, There are issues and controversies that must be faced. At the same time we have to choose our battles well. We don’t have to die on every hill. Daniel was a man of strict integrity who still got promoted in Babylon, of all places. I imagine he chose his battles well. His diet was very important. His prayer life was so important he would not back down even from the lion’s den. At the same time I can’t see Daniel getting promoted in Babylon by making an issue out of every little thing. I see him following the counsel Paul gave us, to live as peacefully with people as possible, instead of stirring up controversy. For Daniel to be such a man of integrity and still get promoted in Babylon, he must have learned some diplomacy. Again I don’t see him doing that by making mountains out of molehills and fighting every battle that could possibly be fought,  and dying on every hill there was to die on. 

Let’s consider the story of the paralytic. Let’s pay attention to the different participants in this story and what each person or group were doing. Which ones were engaged in the Gospel and which ones were engaged in controversy? 

And again He entered Capernaum after some days, and it was heard that He was in the house. ]Immediately many gathered together, so that there was no longer room to receive them, not even near the door. And He preached the word to them. Then they came to Him, bringing a paralytic who was carried by four men.  And when they could not come near Him because of the crowd, they uncovered the roof where He was. So when they had broken through, they let down the bed on which the paralytic was lying. When Jesus saw their faith, He said to the paralytic, “Son, your sins are forgiven you.”  And some of the scribes were sitting there and reasoning in their hearts, “Why does this Man speak blasphemies like this? Who can forgive sins but God alone?”  But immediately, when Jesus perceived in His spirit that they reasoned thus within themselves, He said to them, “Why do you reason about these things in your hearts? Which is easier, to say to the paralytic, ‘Your sins are forgiven you,’ or to say, ‘Arise, take up your bed and walk’? But that you may know that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sins”—He said to the paralytic, “I say to you, arise, take up your bed, and go to your house.”  Immediately he arose, took up the bed, and went out in the presence of them all, so that all were amazed and glorified God, saying, “We never saw anything like this!” Mark 2:1-12 NKJV

Jesus was preaching the Gospel. Some were carrying a man to Jesus so he could benefit from the gospel. Notice, though, it’s the people seated in the house that are causing controversy, (not all, I am sure) by questioning Jesus’ right to forgive. Jesus was too busy for controversy because He was too busy preaching the Gospel. As a matter of fact, His only response to the controversy was to amplify the Gospel by healing the man as well as forgiving him. The people bringing the paralytic to Jesus were so busy helping the man find Jesus that they had no time to engage in controversy. The only people in this story who had time for controversy were the people sitting in church waiting for something to be said that could turn into a controversy. 

Maybe there would be less time for controversy if we were all like the Wesleyans engaged in helping sinners find the Savior. Maybe there would be less time for controversy if instead of sitting in church critiquing the new elder’s sermon and his wife’s dress, we were busy creating an opening in the church to let people in who are hungering and thirsting for forgiveness and the Gospel. 

Maybe you’re right. Maybe the red carpet in the church does need to be replaced with an earth tone carpet instead. But while you were pleading your case in the board meeting, a young single mother could have used an encouraging phone call reminding her she is not alone and God loves her. You can amplify the need for earth tone carpet or you can amplify the Gospel. 

Maybe you’re right. Maybe the church should have reimbursed you for traveling all the way to see a church member in the larger hospital all the way in the city. You also had to pay for parking. The church did not reimburse you for that either, even though they paid for the youth group to go into the city to buy ice cream. It’s not fair. But you got to share Jesus with the sick church member and even prayed with the person in the next bed. Leave that with Jesus. After all, you did not do it for the church. You did it for Jesus. Let Him pay you. He saw what you did. He will provide for you. You can amplify your rights or you can amplify the Gospel. 

Maybe you’re right. Maybe your understanding of the 144,ooo is right ,and the Sabbath school teacher is wrong. But while you were fighting your case in Sabbath School, a teenage boy was loitering in the church hallway, not because he didn’t want to go to his Sabbath School class, but because he’s not sure he is worthy. You see, he found his uncle’s porn stash and got all tangled up in that again. He wasn’t looking for it. It was just there. Now he’s wondering why God allowed that to happen? He is wondering if God can forgive him – again. He is nowhere close to being able to debate and split hairs about Christian perfection. He just wants to know if God still loves him and can free him again from this one addiction. Amplify the Gospel. 

You may study this week’s Sabbath School lesson here.

3: Controversies-Sabbath School Lesson Teaching Plan

Prepared by William Earnhardt, for Sabbath School class, July 20, 2024.

Main Theme: This week we will look at how Jesus handled some controversial situations and what we can learn from Him.

Read in Class: Mark 2:1-12. Discuss the main ideas in this passage.

Study: What was the paralytic looking for when he was brought to Jesus, and what did he receive?

Apply: In the story in Mark 2:1-12, Jesus is preaching the Gospel. A group of frirends are bringing another friend to Jesus to hear the Gospel. Another group of people are critisizing Jesus and questioning Jesus’ words and methods. Which group to you most closely identify with and why? Which group was doing waht they were supposed to be doing?

Share: Your friend asks how Micah 6:6-8 explains what was happening between Jesus and the leaders. What do you tell your friend?

Read in Class: Mark 2:13-22. Ask the class to summarize this passage.

Study: Who was Levi, the son of Alphaeus, and why would there be an objection to him becoming a disciple of Jesus?

Apply: Who are those who today might be looked upon as the tax collectors were in Jesus’ day? How do we adjust our thinking regarding them?

Share: Your friend asks you if we should be fasting to today, and if so why and how? What do you tell your friend?

Read in Class: Mark 2:23-28. Discuss the main idea of this passage.

Study: How does Jesus counter the charge brought by the Pharisees?

Apply: In the NLT Mark 2:24 says the pharisees accused the disciples of “harvesting grain on the Sabbath.” Really? All they were doing was plucking a few heads of grain to eat right then. Would you really consider that “harvesting?” Were the pharisees going a little overboard on this accusation? What are some things we sometimes go overbaord on or may be a little too picky about?

Share: Your friend asks you what Mark 3:1-6 teaches about Sabbath keeping. What do you tell your friend?

Read in Class: Mark 3:20-35. Discuss the main idea of this passage.

Study: What connection do you see between the two stories intertwined in this passage?

Apply: Based on Scripture how would you explain what the unpardonable sin is?

Share: Your friend says she is afraid she has commited the unpardonable sin. What do you tell your friend?