Tag / some principles of Bible Prophecy

by In Light Of The Cross

Called out of a Babylonian Way of Thinking Into a Christ-Centered Way of Thinking

Several years ago, I read Cowan and Kuenster’s compelling yet depressing book To Sleep With the Angels: The Story of a Fire. It was about a horrific fire where a Catholic school burned, and 92 students and three teachers perished. The book investigated all the things that went wrong that day. For example, the Mother Superior was substituting in the Kindergarten room, unaware that the rest of the school was on fire. The problem was that only Mother Superior could call for an evacuation, so several teachers kept their students in their smoke-filled rooms waiting for Mother Superior’s permission to evacuate. Finally, after it was too late, the teachers decided to go ahead and evacuate even though they did not have her permission. 

As I read this book, I could not help but be amazed at a hierarchy system that would not allow the students and teachers to think and act for themselves, causing them to lose their lives! I thought that many in that type of hierarchical system will burn in the lake of fire simply because they trusted in the hierarchy instead of studying the Bible for themselves. 

The doctrine that God has committed to the church the right to control the conscience, and to define and punish heresy, is one of the most deeply rooted of papal errors.-Ellen White, The Great Controversy, Page 293. 

While reading about a Catholic School, I realized many wonderful Catholics are reading their Bibles and finding Bible truth. I recognize also that while spiritual Babylon is a specific system, it is also an attitude. It’s the attitude of those at the tower of Babel and later in Daniel 4. It is the Babylonian king who thought he was saved by his mighty power, when he said, “Is not this great Babylon, that I have built for a royal dwelling by my mighty power and the honor of my majesty?” Daniel 4:30 NKJV So I see all down through the ages, Babylon is an attitude, and that attitude can be found anywhere, including our hearts. So the call out of Babylon is more than just a call out of a papal system. It is a call out of a hierarchy-based mindset. That mindset goes back way before the papacy. It was in the church of Christ’s day, and that is why He had to call His disciples out of that mindset when He told them, 

“You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those who are great exercise authority over them.  Yet it shall not be so among you; but whoever desires to become great among you, let him be your servant.  And whoever desires to be first among you, let him be your slave—  just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many.” Matthew 20:25-28 NKJV

This tells me the call out of Babylon in Revelation 18 may involve more than just a few doctrines on the Sabbath and the state of the Dead. I may be called out of a legalistic or authoritarian Babylonian mindset into a whole new way of thinking. 

After these things, I saw another angel coming down from heaven, having great authority, and the earth was illuminated with his glory. And he cried mightily with a loud voice, saying, “Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and has become a dwelling place of demons, a prison for every foul spirit, and a cage for every unclean and hated bird! For all the nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth have become rich through the abundance of her luxury.” Revelation 18:1-4 NKJV

The call out of Babylon is a call out of a false system of worship. This false worship is more than a false day of worship. It also worships a false god called “legalism,” better known as “our works.” It is also a calling out of a false hierarchical system that is based on humans assuming the prerogative of God to compel the conscience of those  “under them” to act and worship a certain way. And it is a calling out of complying with the direction of people in positions of power to do things that are against the principles of the Bible, which asks us to worship God alone, and allow Him to guide our conscience instead of man.

We are not just called out of false churches. No matter what church we attend, we need to come out of a false way of thinking into a new mindset. We are called out of the hierarchical system of not only the papal mindset but also the mindset of the Babylonians and the religious leaders in Christ’s day. We are called out of the mindset of becoming dictators into the mentality of servants serving God and others the way Christ served His Father and others. And we are called out of placing man in the place of God Himself. 

You may study this week’s Sabbath School Lesson here.

by In Light Of The Cross

What is Wrong With the Futuristic View of Revelation?

Protestant reformers like Martin Luther used a system of prophetic interpretation based on fulfilled prophecies of the past. They found the keys to prophecies for the future in fulfilled prophecies of the past. They saw, for instance, how prophecies had been given in days and fulfilled in years. They saw names and animals that had been used for certain world powers, and they saw these same names and some of the same animals used in prophecies for the future. When Martin Luther used this system to interpret the prophecies of Revelation, he concluded that the system of the papacy was the antichrist in the book of Revelation.

Now keep in mind that it was never Martin Luther’s intention to start a new church. He wanted to reform the Catholic church. He was trying to work within the church to bring it back to the Bible, but when the church refused to go back to the Bible, Luther had to move forward.

John Hus, John Knox and many more Protestant reformers preached that the Pope was the antichrist, and that interpretation was carried on by the churches they founded. The 1260 day-for-a-year prophecy has demonstrated their calculations to be correct. Yet today, while we understand that God has His people in every church, including the Catholic church, 1many are afraid to identify the antichrist in Revelation as the papal system. Because of this, a new way of studying Bible prophecy was devised, 2which is what we now know as the futuristic approach in place of the previous historicist approach used by the Reformers and earlier Christians. It played an important role in the  Counter Reformation. This places all of the events in Revelation in the future so as not to identify the papacy as the antichrist. However, this theory has several flaws.

For instance, in January 1991, the United States began Desert Storm to relieve Kuwait from Iraqi oppression. U.S. helicopters and other aircraft were swarming the desert. At the time, a popular theologian in the futuristic tradition suggested that Revelation 9:3 was being fulfilled since the locusts mentioned in this passage were symbolic of the helicopters swarming the desert.

The problem with that interpretation is that Revelation 9 has already been precisely fulfilled, using the day-for-a-year principle concerning 391 years and 15 days, ending on exactly August 11, 1840, when the Ottoman Empire accepted guarantees and declared its dependence upon surrounding nations to survive. 3When this prophecy was fulfilled right down to the exact day of August 11, 1840, many people who had scoffed at the Bible became Bible-believing Christians. 

Today most popular Protestant churches have rejected the historicist method of interpreting prophecy, as it is no longer politically correct to identify the antichrist biblically. They have joined the Catholic church’s interpretation of prophecy in Revelation to put everything in the future, thus nullifying much of what was accomplished and gained in the Reformation. 

Here are some problems that exist now with the futuristic view of prophecy.

With the futuristic approach to Revelation, there is no way to determine the probable accuracy of an interpretation because there are no checks and balances, such as the day-for-a-year principle, to test predictions. For example, Desert Storm does not fit the time period for Revelation 9.  However,  interpretations using the day-for-a-year principle fall into place with other prophecies in Daniel and Revelation. With the futuristic approach, there is no rhyme or reason to interpretations, and many predictions are only proven wrong once they don’t come to pass. That’s why some have called The Revelation “the happy hunting ground of fraudsters and religious fanatics.” 

The futuristic view denies all prophecies that have already been accurately fulfilled using the day-year principle by putting them in the future. This means nullifying much of the evidence that the Bible is true. This destroys not only the credibility of prophecies but of the Bible itself. 

While recognizing that God has His people in all churches, and that every church has sincere worshipers who will make up the kingdom of heaven, we should not be afraid to teach accurate prophetic interpretations, even though they may not be currently “politically correct.”

By using the historical day-for-year principle in studying the prophecies of Revelation, we prove the Bible to be true and trusted by what has already been accurately fullfifilled, and we can properly warn all of God’s people in all of us churches of the false teachers and their doctrines which lead men away from Jesus, as our only True Teacher. 

Do you have any experience to share about the day-for-a-year principle compared to the futuristic view?

References

  1. I believe there will be more Catholics in heaven than in any other church. ↩
  2. Look up Francisco Ribera (1537–1591), the originator of the futuristic approach to prophecy. ↩
  3. You can see a facsimile copy of Josiah Litch’s original article in the Signs of the Times of Aug. 1, 1840 ↩

You may study this week’s Sabbath School lesson here.